View Single Post
  #8  
Old 11-24-2009, 04:48 PM
wasabi622 wasabi622 is offline
Founder: 5,060 club.
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 5,900
wasabi622 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildfire View Post
well, dude, thats the power of music: different people interpret it differently... some may recall an old love, another a happy time, while to some its just a tune. However that whole Acoustic performance seemed so subdued in a way that so un-Alizee.. especially the time previously that we had seen her.. jumping around in En Concert, double-jointed waves and all!

One person saw the A contre Courant song in En Concert as sad and they made me think the same way of the song after I re-interpreted it myself that way: I saw it where she was saying goodbye to her fans for the next four years, unbeknownst to her or her fans. She was down in the audience pit holding hand hands and so forth.. in hindsight now one can reinterpret. I think the same is going on for you. Now I take your interpretation and build on it with the fact that the music industry is struggling, Alize knows it and even has said that it concerns her.. and I see how thats even affected her business and profession. And how those MCE era videos were from a happier time before the recession and the recent pitfalls of the music industry...

I also interpret it as how there's "no going back".. kinda like a loss of innocence... Alizee is now a mom, married, changed forever, in so much of her words.. its kinda how I felt about Parler Tout Bas: I interpret it as Alizee saying goodbye to the Gourmandises days of her youth and becoming a young lady from a girl. Keep in mind I discovered all of Alizee's music this past summer.. so its all hindsight... even Psychadelicies.

We are so used to stars maintaining a continuity.. even the chameleon Madonna.. yeah her music styles change but its still madonna... that artist like Alizée seem like such an oddity... and by some a "failure" because there isn't this overly marketed and commercialized artist or overexposure. I let Psychadelicies grow on me partly because I've come to respect the artist and her conviction. I'll get her next album pretty much sight unseen... well as possible as that is with the availability in the states, because I'm willing to let this artist take me on this journey that she's on. Granted, I do miss the MCE and GM era, but much of that is due to Laurant and Mylene as architects, as much as it has to do with Alizée's raw talent and dedication. But thats the past now.. As much as I'd like to relive that, I'd hate to see Alizée go back to that just to sell some records. So maybe that helps your feelings Wasabi...


Just a point of how the music industry is hurting, check out this youtube channel:

http://www.youtube.com/user/alizeemp3?blend=1&ob=4#p/u
look at the psychedelices playlist.. Omitting the songs that her her singles (MJ/50-60), people listen to the remainder cuts of the album almost 48,000 times on average. MJ/50-60 are almost at 100K views. The MJ video on this user's page is close to 350K views. Dunno how the youtube counter works, if it can distinguish multiple views from unique. Thae channel has over half a million views BTW.


My point is that to my knowledge, other than exposure, there is really no profit to the publisher or artist for this conduit, where previously it was radio or purchased album, i.e. means for them to profit. And this is from an unadvertised, unofficial online source. Its come to the point that there's a sense of entitlement to free music now.. from shitheads who think that because its out there, like an unlocked door or a wallet left unattended, that its now theirs. And yes, its the same thing: theft. In fact I know people who take pride in all of the ripped off intellectual property they have. Thats sad.

I just bought two Moby CD's sight unseen.. from a record store.. remember those? I support that artist because he too has taken me on journey's with his music that if I went by first listen only, I wouldn't have liked. I think thats whats been lost in the music industry where tastes are acquired and not strictly marketed to in pursuit of profit. I'd hate to think that I've cheated Moby out of his earned pay by stealing his music.. even if its just passive as listening to it via a user upload on youtube. I think there is a part of that in what you might be feeling as "goodbye" to an era of music sales that made it ownership tangible, i.e. a purchase, rather than what we have today, which is a glib, almost indifferent listening to streams on illegal conduits like Youtube.

yeah, don't get me wrong, change is needed and appreciated every once a while, but the way she's going about it.. i mean, how successful can anyone really be in changing who they are perceived to be?

i quite clearly understand why Alizee would like to leave the lolita image behind, but is it possible?

for example, despite being hundreds of films, Arnold Schwarzenegger will almost always be known as the terminator. even now, he's the "governator". Or take Sylvester Stallone, he'll always be known as either Rocky Balboa, or Rambo. Or Christopher Lloyd, almost always be known as Dr. Emmet Brown.

everyone has that image/character that really makes them successful. is it wise to throw that out?

but back to the video. i don't know if it's just the way the person edited it or not, juxtaposing Alizee singing the new version of JEAM with the footage of the old JEAM dance, but i really hope that she doesn't tone anything down for the sake of change!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jalen View Post
wasabi, we should hang out some time

I agree with you completely


On the surface, the new version of JEAM is not a bad redo.. well, you already know how we feel about it.

I also feel this way about her new version of Moi Lolita where she throws in the extra "hey mr. dj" lyrics
heck yeah we should!! we need an Alizee America get together someday.
__________________


Last edited by wasabi622; 11-24-2009 at 04:49 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply With Quote