View Single Post
  #38  
Old 11-09-2006, 06:28 PM
spysmasher's Avatar
spysmasher spysmasher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Alabama, USA
Age: 63
Posts: 164
spysmasher is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RMJ View Post
Like I said before, 3D and images doesn't fit in same phrase. Image is never three dimensional. When adding the third dimension, it becomes object (or model, or whatever you wish to call it). Images are always 2D. Image of 3D object is always projection.
Actually, the English word "image" simply means a representation of a person or thing ... including such truly 3-D representations as a statue or bust. What you have been saying about "image" applies to the word "picture" -- which is by definition flat or 2-D -- but not the word "image." Etymology bears this out. "Image" comes from the Latin imago, which was often used by the Romans to refer to statues or busts; whereas "picture" comes from the Latin pictura which originally meant "a painting." So there is nothing contradictory about the term "3-D image," but, technically, it would have to refer to a statue or something like that. As you and others have already pointed out, though, people tend to use that term somewhat inaccurately to refer to a picture that gives the illusion of being 3-D.
Reply With Quote