Government bans the use of Mademoiselle

[texasguy]

Originally Posted by Un-rêve

Who the fuck is Chris Crocker?

Leave Britney alone?

[Finnishguy]

Originally Posted by Un-rêve

Who the fuck is Chris Crocker?

Something more than the fuck.
Have you ever heard about internet? If you're been there for some minutes you should know who's that guy. Well, maybe not, but yeah..it takes time to make things clear..

[Karlalizee]

Originally Posted by pepelepew

From Matt Pokora & Alizée are dating (Rumor) Karla, it's women that are leading the charge against Mademoiselle, not men. We get the blame no matter what lol. You do have a point.

I read the article and I know that it was women's rights organizations that pushed this through. I still find it upsetting that basic decisions are being taken away just because a group of women decide what is best for all other women.

[pepelepew]

Originally Posted by Karlalizee

I read the article and I know that it was women's rights organizations that pushed this through. I still find it upsetting that basic decisions are being taken away just because a group of women decide what is best for all other women.

It is frustrating. It seems that in most cases the squeaky wheel gets the grease especially in this era of political correctness. The few seem to be dictating for the many.

[Azhiri]

Originally Posted by Karlalizee

I read the article and I know that it was women's rights organizations that pushed this through. I still find it upsetting that basic decisions are being taken away just because a group of women decide what is best for all other women.

I agree, I don't like those kinds of organizations for that reason. They may mean well but some of their endeavors just aren't practical, and most of the time I feel a little embarrassed that some people think all women would be so sensitive toward certain subjects.

[Rev]

Originally Posted by Karlalizee

I read the article and I know that it was women's rights organizations that pushed this through. I still find it upsetting that basic decisions are being taken away just because a group of women decide what is best for all other women.

I have to agree with them. With regards to legal documents (and legal documents only), if they want to know whether someone is married or not they should ask that question. If they have no valid reason for asking the question then it should not be on a legal document.

[pepelepew]

Originally Posted by Rev

I have to agree with them. With regards to legal documents (and legal documents only), if they want to know whether someone is married or not they should ask that question. If they have no valid reason for asking the question then it should not be a legal document.

Agree 100% if that is the real motive.

[Streambeta]

Originally Posted by Rev

I have to agree with them. With regards to legal documents (and legal documents only), if they want to know whether someone is married or not they should ask that question. If they have no valid reason for asking the question then it should not be a legal document.

Which is exactly why I put "NA" for job applications that ask about what race you are. If you are going to use the information to show the diversity your company has then you can ask that question ONCE that person is hired.

As for the whole married question on legal documents I could care less, you can ask me all you want, don't care.

[Taxi Driver Aaron]

I think they should ban women's rights while they are at it

[Karlalizee]

Originally Posted by Taxi Driver Aaron

I think they should ban women's rights while they are at it

Someone is just begging for a butt whoopin'!