Some new photos

[Ben.Daly]

Huge credit to the great work of imverynuts, who's recently come across a bunch of high quality photos (which I couldn't wait to share here, hopefully that's alright). Some we already had in HD, but now have even more improved versions of them, plus a bunch of other great pictures!

Here's the full selection: https://imgur.com/a/9YZvT3I


Below are some of my favourites of the collection.

[Scruffydog777]

Thank you to Ben.Daly and imverynuts!

[imverynuts]

I don't know why I didn't post this here yet haha but thanks Ben and you're welcome everyone. I will say this was 50% selfish reasons for getting all those photos though, can't let them fall of the internet forever

Edit: Btw I know some of these photos you guys have seen plenty of times, however I bought them anyway because they are in their original, first-time quality that even the high resolution versions of yore don't actually match. They must've been using cutting edge digital photography since this level of detail is good even for today:


vs the old "high res" here:

[Mr Coucou]

[QUOTE=imverynuts;272343]They must've been using cutting edge digital photography since this level of detail is good even for today:

Most of the photos that I see here were from 2000-2003; so I would assume they were taken with 35mm film, rather than digital.

Another question is that a number of the photos were from TV performances. They look like they're too high-res to be screencaps of video, so they must have had a still photographer in the audience?

[Alex Rien]

Merci Ben.

[Aragorn97]

Originally Posted by Mr Coucou

so they must have had a still photographer in the audience?

I think I saw the one where she's wearing the tie in a magazine, so you may be right.

[imverynuts]

Originally Posted by Mr Coucou

Most of the photos that I see here were from 2000-2003; so I would assume they were taken with 35mm film, rather than digital.

Film was that sharp? I dunno I guess. Just glad we got the originals now!

Originally Posted by Mr Coucou

Another question is that a number of the photos were from TV performances. They look like they're too high-res to be screencaps of video, so they must have had a still photographer in the audience?

Yah I believe so, makes sense before high end 4k+ cameras were around you'd have still photographers to supplement live appearances for articles and stuff.