#11
|
||||
|
||||
are you saying En Concert 2004 can be remastered to where she is 3D? How is that possible if they didn't have 3D movie-making cameras?
__________________
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And yes a normal DVD movie can be remastered to 3D, however the results are not the best. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
yah I knew Blu Rays are just higher quality movies, but I never knew they could go back into movies after they are created and make them 3D!!!Technology these days
__________________
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
thats a GREAT idea for someone to do.... we should ask around and see how that would be possible.
__________________
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Clash of the Titans was filmed in non 3d filmed but was later mastered into 3d, so it could be done.
__________________
ZBT<3Alizée
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
If they had multiple camera shots, I can see them going back and remastering in 3-D.
__________________
--- pace e salute --- |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Broadband creates opportunity for second-tier entertainers?
It is a pity that it is taking so long for theaters to deploy 3D projectors, because now all the TV makers are pushing the sale of home 3D TV sets very hard. This is helping to close a window of opportunity for second-tier entertainers to perform live before a non-local audience without the threat of Napsterism.
Let me explain. A first-tier performer can fill a large concert hall, theater or stadium, because enough people exist within traveling distance. A second-tier entertainer cannot. But the near-universal rollout of broadband Internet access in wealthy countries would seem to provide an opportunity for second-tier performers who cannot gather such a group locally, but CAN do so when mediated by telecommunications. That's because they can now gang together a network of small theaters to which a live video signal is fed simultaneously, and so amalgamate a huge audience which lets them put on a high-cost show. The ability to audit and even search patrons in a theater setting greatly reduces the threat of Napsterism, which would be present if the video was streamed directly to homes. An added barrier would exist if theaters had 3D gear to provide a 3D show and homes did not, because even if a 3D recording were made by a clandestine techie in a theater (BTW, now a felony in the US), it could not be viewed in full 3D glory absent 3D TV sets in homes. Sure, some homes have PCs with 3D screens and some have PCs attached to big screens, but lacking both at once would raise a formidable barrier to making the pirate recording truly available to homes. But as I started saying, it is no longer clear that theaters will fully rollout 3D projectors before 3D TV sets saturate US homes. Of course, for now it still remains the case that not all music recordings people enjoy are pirated, and the problem is even less severe with video recordings. So it is not implausible that someone like Alizée could do a performance using a network of theaters, some 2D, some 3D, and gather a big enough group globally to put on a first-class show. In any case, it is clear such a "narrowcasting" scheme is far more resistant to Napsterism than video streams sent to individual homes. And a theatrical setting would also allow for "audience participation" in the show, both within the inidvidual theaters, and with a feed back to the performer, globally as well. By the way, while you could not high-five Alizée in a televised 3D show, it provides an opportunity to do what an unmediated in-person experience cannot for the vast majority of a large audience. That's because the 3D camera can always have a "first-row seat" in which there is substantial stereopsis, which everyone can enjoy. Once you are many Alizée's in distance away from Alizée, she will appear "flat," even in person. This is also a good argument for using giant 3D screens at large-scale in-person performances, too. There are a number of phenomenon that help your brain determine the size and shape of something. To a degree, you could make Alizée appear more like the size of Tinkerbell if the two lenses capturing her stereoscopic image had a lateral displacement much larger than that of the eyes of a typical human. <center><img src="http://www.adorama.com/ALC/Files.ashx?link_id=70290abf-8935-14b4-7021-78ef87cbf043"></center> Last edited by FanDeAliFee; 05-10-2010 at 02:27 AM.. Reason: shrinking Lili howto |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But the even better thing would to have a 3D DVD of Alizée's upcoming 2010 tour, wherever it may take place. Now that would be a treasure to have(but still not as good as getting her autographduh haha)
__________________
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
The 3D production cost premium
<big><big><big><i>Shooting live action in 3-D generally costs about 25 percent to 30 percent more than conventional filming, analysts say, though the premium may be even higher for low-budget productions.</i> - <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/13/technology/13iht-film.html"><i>The New York Times</i></a>.</big></big></big>
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I was investigating the posibility of a blu-ray flat-screen set up complete with blu-ray DVD Player and HDMI, about at least a fifty inch diagonal, and that was about $ 3,600.00 total. If you already have a DVD in HD then all it would take to view it in blu-ray would be the HDMI cables; quite simple, really. But I don't know about viewing the same in 3D though. What 'docdtv' shows on one of his latest postings is intriguing but, still, not all peoples have the same eyesight; some myopic, others are far-sighted, etc. It might all depend on having prescription glasses/lens for all persons to view equally. Plus the overall energy comsumption of all those HD TVs, at least, drawing vast amounts of energy from the electric grids. Some cities are really being taxed on their energy reserves with all those HD TVs out there. Last edited by WyomingGrizFan; 05-13-2010 at 03:53 AM.. |
Tags |
2010, 3dimesional, alizee, en concert, mexico |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|