#51
|
||||
|
||||
Naw, just south of it in Toronto as Radio said. link
Quote:
There should probably be one little blue dot in each province to account for them, but I just didn't think that deepy when I made the little pic, lol. Last edited by HibyPrime; 10-18-2006 at 07:49 PM.. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
BTW, why do usEnglish even say O.K.?
__________________
Vive Lili! Last edited by rwd716; 10-18-2006 at 10:59 PM.. |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
meGoogled |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
I would love to hear Alizée say 'Tiguidou!' I had a French girlfriend from Québec who used it all the time. I thought it was adorable. It's used by some speakers of Québec French to mean 'ok!' instead of 'd'accord!'
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
It's not new! We (occasionally) use "ok" since decades already and it's even in French dictionaries now . But "d'accord" remains more natural and way more used of course.
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry to bump this back up, but for those of you with mediocre French skills who want a free online spelling and grammer checker can try this one designed by the University of Alberta to help out their students who were learning French. It's faster than using a word processor for forums and stuff. The interface can be set to English or French.
It also has all you accented vowels so you just have to click on the one you want if you don't know how to type it. Last edited by Twitch; 10-22-2006 at 09:42 AM.. |
#57
|
||||
|
||||
I just took a look and it looks great! I'll test it more to see if it's very efficient.
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
I like it, only thing is because they designed it to help you learn French it doesn't automatically fix your mistakes, explains what is wrong and then you have to fix them yourself. So not as efficient as having everything corrected automatically but really great in helping you learn. And they based on French not Québecois so it's more appropriate for formal writing, leaving the colourful nature of Québecois for everyday conversation.
Edit: They do welcome comments for improvements if you find anything wrong with it. Last edited by Twitch; 10-22-2006 at 09:49 AM.. |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
I've made some tests and of course it can't point all grammar and conjugation errors. Too complex for a software, at least nowadays. They should have a semantic engine and that should be hard/huge to develop...
|
|
|